<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nonsense Comment Spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottgatz.com/2005/11/07/nonsense-comment-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottgatz.com/2005/11/07/nonsense-comment-spam/</link>
	<description>I learn something new every day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:48:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.scottgatz.com/2005/11/07/nonsense-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-112868</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 09:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottgatz.com/blog/2005/11/07/nonsense-comment-spam/#comment-112868</guid>
		<description>Nice useful and informative article, but still i think Spam Filtering may reduce the number of spam for a short while but you cant say that it is an ultimate solution to Spamming. The reason is that the Spammers are aware of these filtering techniques whether it is Filtering with SK or some other. There are many websites available that are providing the information on Anti-Spamming Solutions but most of this information is either irrelevant or not useful. I have recently visited a website that I would like to suggest  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.anti-spam-info.com&quot; title=&quot;Spam Filtering&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Spam-Filtering, Comment Spam&lt;/a&gt; Website</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice useful and informative article, but still i think Spam Filtering may reduce the number of spam for a short while but you cant say that it is an ultimate solution to Spamming. The reason is that the Spammers are aware of these filtering techniques whether it is Filtering with SK or some other. There are many websites available that are providing the information on Anti-Spamming Solutions but most of this information is either irrelevant or not useful. I have recently visited a website that I would like to suggest  <a href="http://www.anti-spam-info.com" title="Spam Filtering" rel="nofollow">Spam-Filtering, Comment Spam</a> Website</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ham Radio Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.scottgatz.com/2005/11/07/nonsense-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>Ham Radio Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottgatz.com/blog/2005/11/07/nonsense-comment-spam/#comment-384</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A new kind of comment spam?...&lt;/strong&gt;

	During the last days I get an incredible amount of comment spam in my blog. But it is not &quot;normal&quot; spam. First it contains links to CNN, Google, Adobe etc. and second it contains links with the nofollow tag. Additionally two of the three links conta...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A new kind of comment spam?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>	During the last days I get an incredible amount of comment spam in my blog. But it is not &#8220;normal&#8221; spam. First it contains links to CNN, Google, Adobe etc. and second it contains links with the nofollow tag. Additionally two of the three links conta&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: groc</title>
		<link>http://www.scottgatz.com/2005/11/07/nonsense-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>groc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 15:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottgatz.com/blog/2005/11/07/nonsense-comment-spam/#comment-217</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m starting to think it&#039;s because they&#039;ve finally gone completely insane. Most spammers can&#039;t be right in the head in the first place - otherwise they&#039;d just get themselves proper jobs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m starting to think it&#8217;s because they&#8217;ve finally gone completely insane. Most spammers can&#8217;t be right in the head in the first place &#8211; otherwise they&#8217;d just get themselves proper jobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ihre Denkfabrik zu Social Software &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Weblog Spam</title>
		<link>http://www.scottgatz.com/2005/11/07/nonsense-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Ihre Denkfabrik zu Social Software &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Weblog Spam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 19:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottgatz.com/blog/2005/11/07/nonsense-comment-spam/#comment-151</guid>
		<description>[...] Scott Gatz vermutet eine erste Welle, um die Spam-Resistenz zu prÃ¼fen: The only crazy idea I can come up with is that the spammers are using some sort of learning technique to figure out what will go through filters and what will get blacklist. Once they learn the technique, then they swap the URLS? Does anyone know? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Scott Gatz vermutet eine erste Welle, um die Spam-Resistenz zu prÃ¼fen: The only crazy idea I can come up with is that the spammers are using some sort of learning technique to figure out what will go through filters and what will get blacklist. Once they learn the technique, then they swap the URLS? Does anyone know? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthias</title>
		<link>http://www.scottgatz.com/2005/11/07/nonsense-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 19:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottgatz.com/blog/2005/11/07/nonsense-comment-spam/#comment-150</guid>
		<description>Perhaps a kind of Google-Bombing-Experiment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps a kind of Google-Bombing-Experiment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathilde</title>
		<link>http://www.scottgatz.com/2005/11/07/nonsense-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathilde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 09:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottgatz.com/blog/2005/11/07/nonsense-comment-spam/#comment-61</guid>
		<description>I mostly wonder why spammers cant spell...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mostly wonder why spammers cant spell&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil jones</title>
		<link>http://www.scottgatz.com/2005/11/07/nonsense-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>phil jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2005 12:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottgatz.com/blog/2005/11/07/nonsense-comment-spam/#comment-57</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re probably trying to confuse automatic spam filters by filling the comments up with as much plausible stuff as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re probably trying to confuse automatic spam filters by filling the comments up with as much plausible stuff as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
